Blank page included in Synagro's application leads holder to believe they can't release public information
On October 31, 2016, Synagro submitted a Special Exception Site Plan application to Plainfield Township, on the deadline for appearance at November's planning commission meeting. A township official reports there was no prior contact by Synagro with the Zoning Officer. Contacting the Zoning Officer prior to submitting an application is typical, because an Applicant usually wants to get approval of the their use prior to proceeding with an expensive Site Plan and preparation. In the case of a $20m plant, you would want to get it right.
The submission of an application requires the planning commission to place a review on its agenda, and the Site Plan to be submitted to the township engineer for comment prior to the review. There is only one conclusion one can draw, who is familiar with the process and the modus operandi of business applicants. Those who file on the deadline invariably do not want the public to know about their application, and/or know that their use is not allowed and/or associated variances are not merited. In this case, it is likely all of the above.
Let's look at one piece of evidence. In the package that Synagro submitted, there is a piece of public relations fluff that is not necessary to the application and serves no purpose other than possibly to sway the planners to believe Synagro's use is "green" and a great idea.
The first thing to notice is that on each page, diagonally there are the faint words "DO NOT COPY". Interestingly, if you copy or fax this document, those words disappear. The facsimile attached is from photos. Now, why would those words be there? Once submitted, that document is public information, and would have to be released in a Right to Know Request, IF THE PUBLIC KNEW TO REQUEST IT. But there was no requirement for the township to notify the residents, and Synagro knew this. Those words are there to falsely lead the recipients of it to believe they can't copy it. How nice the words evaporate if someone does inadvertently copy it. Give the person who came up with this a raise.
This document contains the following statement at the bottom of page 4: "Public notifications and hearings will be advertised to provide public participation in the process by making available project information and the opportunity to offer comments and address questions."
Advertising fluff in Synagro's application, with false claim that public will be notified
of public review meeting and "DO NOT COPY" plastered across it
What Synagro did do, is publish this document (without "DO NOT COPY") on their website the following day, Nov 22, 2016, along with a press release dated Nov 22, 2016 for the "Slate Belt Heat Recovery Center". Public opportunity to participate and offer comments and questions my ass.
You may ask "why isn't is called the 'Synagro Biosolids Plant'?" Good question. Green Knight's plan to recover heat from its Energy Center's turbines died on the vine in 2003 when Techo Bloc bought all three parcels that were to be the "Slate Belt Industrial Center". Without a manufacturer that could consume Green Knight's waste heat on a nearby site, the plan died. Until resurrected recently, that is, by placing the consumer where it can't be placed, on Waste Managment's lot that is already being used. There seems to be a fascination of Waste Management and its nonprofit arm GKEDC with prefacing everything in the area with "Slate Belt". Placing "Green Knight" in the name of the nonprofit makes everyone think of the school's mascot, but what has Green Knight done for the school recently? Contribute to the band, the athletic department? Simply put, the name "Slate Belt Heat Recovery Center" resurrects and idea from Green Knight's infancy - an idea that died shortly after the Energy Center opened.
The substance of the PR document above is as one would expect, and won't be covered in this post. One thing to note is it mentions the source of the shit is the "Tri-State area," yet in a recent Morning Call article suddenly shit from Pennsylvania has shown up in the plan. What's with that?
Now that the shit has hit the fan, and Plainfield Township's BOS and residents from Wind Gap and Pen Argyl are yelling "no mas shit!", Synagro has announced they will hold "public information" sessions on Jan 9 at the Plainfield Twp Fire Company and Jan 10 and Weona Park. You have to ask why they didn't hold such sessions prior to November 21. Or do you? Green Knight should be questioned heavily at these meetings what the hell they are doing partnering with Synagro, since their mission is to "benefit poor and distressed local citizens". How exactly is this proposal in line with their mission?